FIRST STANZA
Why is the urn
compared to a ” still unravish’d bride”?
- "still" has two meanings - "motionless" or
"remaining in time". Time and motion are two concepts that the
poem explores throughout.
- "unravish’d" means unspoiled - a bride yet to lose her
virginity; similarly, the urn and the scenes it represents are
"unspoiled" by the passage of time, its always the same, it doesn’t
age => agelesness
Explain the term
“sylvan (of the forest) historian”(l.3)
- The urn is a “Sylvan historian” because it records scenes from a
culture lived long ago (ancient greeks); and because it is bordered with
leaves, as well as having scenes of the countryside within.
- Is it paradoxical that the urn, a “bride of quietness”, can tell
its stories “more sweetly than our rhyme” (meaning the poem itself)?
- The gentleness of the term “sylvan historian” and his “flowery
tale” told “sweetly” do not prepare us for the wild sexuality of lines
8-10. (Another contrast!)
What change in
viewpoint occurs in lines 8-10?
- The short questions and frequent repetitions inject pace into the
poem. Notice how the speaker moves from contemplative observer to
emotionally-involved participant with these breathless questions. (We have
another contrast - that of the participant vs the observer). You may want
to think about how I develop this idea throughout, and what it might
suggest about the audience’s relationship with “Art” in general… He gets
excited as he becomes a more active participant in events of the urn
, excitement is created by the short questions which add the pace of
the last lines
Heard melodies are sweet, but those unheard
Are sweeter;
therefore, ye soft pipes, play on;
Not to the sensual ear, but, more endear’d,
Pipe to the
spirit ditties of no tone:
Fair youth, beneath the trees, thou canst not leave
Thy song, nor
ever can those trees be bare;
Bold
Lover, never, never canst thou kiss,
Though winning near the goal yet, do not grieve;
She cannot
fade, though thou hast not thy bliss,
For
ever wilt thou love, and she be fair!
SECOND STANZA
In lines 1-4 I contrast the ideal (in art, love,
and nature) and the real - the “heard melodies”; which does my speaker seem to
prefer at this point? How can you tell?
Thou still unravish’d bride of quietness,
Thou foster-child of
silence and slow time,
Sylvan historian, who canst thus express
A flowery tale
more sweetly than our rhyme:
What leaf-fring’d legend haunts about thy shape
Of deities or
mortals, or of both,
In
Tempe or the dales of Arcady?
What
men or gods are these? What maidens loth?
What mad pursuit? What struggle to
escape?
What
pipes and timbrels? What wild ecstasy?
- Contrast
“Heard melodies are sweet but those
unheard are sweeter”. In this line I believe
this line its related to the desire of what one never had. Those unheard
and imaginated melodies have something that was never listened, therefore are
sweeter and more special. He establishes a difference between the shallow
melodies and the ones that go beyond that and have a more profund meaning. He
seems to believe that real tunes, and intresting melodies are not heard by
humans, but the ones humans can imagine
go beyond that and can be related with the celestial “spirit ditties”. He lets
his imagination flow and bases his story or unheard melody in the drawings
depicted in the urn. PARADOX: There are different things represented in the
urn, but this representations are more real and have more importance in the
imagination than in real life.He is amazed with how the urn stimulasted his
mind and imagination.
Is the idea of unheard pipes an oxymoron?
- Oxymoron: a
statement with two parts which seem contradictory; examples: sad joy, a
wise fool, the sound of silence, or Hamlet's saying, "I must be cruel
only to be kind"
This is an oxymoron as the ideas are opposed
contrasting reality vs imagination. First creating a difference in the creation
of sound and the unheard pipes. This creates and ambivlanece between reality
and mind.
In lines 5-10 we begin to sense a negative
undercurrent to the ideal, to frozen time. How do I use language to help convey
this negativity?
His negativity reflects his problems with love in
his own life, in the poem the fact that he cannot see another person happy
because of love, its clearly represented.
The general idea of the poem seems to be positive
but the words he chooses to use have a negative connotation.
The last six lines contrast the drawback of frozen time;
note the negative phrasing: "canst not leave," "nor ever can," "never, never canst" in lines 5-8. Keats says
not to grieve; whom he is addressing- Then he lists the advantages of frozen
time; however, Keats continues to use negative phrasing even in these lines:
"do not grieve," "cannot fade," and ""hast not thy
bliss." Keats may have done this withought any intention, or there may be
a reason for this negative undertone.
No hay comentarios.:
Publicar un comentario